Following are the Fatwaas issued by Ulemas about FarhatHashmi. The fatwaa of Banori town is authentic with Seal and Stamp. Newspaper article is also attached.
Regarding Authenticity of Dr. Farhat Hashmi (P.hD. from University of Glasgow), please consider the links below, provided by University of Glasgow itself:
Dr Lloyd Ridgeon Lecturer in Islamic Studies (at University of Glasgow) http://www.gla. ac.uk/department s/theology/ staff/lloydridge on/
The full staff mentioned by University of Glasgow for its "Centre for the Study of Islam" can be found at http://www.gla. ac.uk/department s/theology/ research/ centreforthestud yofislam/ staff/
On the link http://www.gla. ac.uk/department s/theology/ research/ centreforthestud yofislam/ projects/
On the same page, Robert Gleave and Paul Luft are also mentioned other than Lloyd Ridgeon with the context of above mentioned conference
Lloyd Ridgeon, Robert Gleave and Paul Luft are, infact, non-muslims.
Comparing our Ulama-e-karam with a person that is taught (directly or in-directly) by these people, one may decide for "authenticity" himself.
May ALLAH swt forgive all of us. Only ALLAH swt knows the condition of hearts and intention. If someone/anyone doing any good work for the din of MUHAMMAD pbuh, I pray Oh AL-Mighty ALLAH bless him with all the rewards.
Does Dr Farhat Hashmi promoting the belief of Molvi Wahiduddin? Who is Molvi Wahiduddin Khan (India) To start, Wahiduddin Khan states that the model of the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallama) is no longer applicable in certain partial matters and that we need to instead adopt the model of Christ: "...Muhammadi model zamani haalat ki nisbat se juzi'i taur par QAABIL-E-INTIBAAQ NA RAHEY GA. IS KE BAJAAI' MASEEH MODEL JUZI'I TAUR PAR QAABIL-E-INTIQAB BAN JAAIY GA."
To make his point all the more clearer, Waheeduddin Khan writes that the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallama) should not be considered to be the “final model” with regards to his minhaaj (pattern/model, i.e. sunnah/qidwah/uswah), but only as the “final prophet” with regards to the deen (religion): "...LAYKIN MINHAAJ KE I`TIBAAR SE AAP FINAL MODEL NA THEI."
Furthermore, he continues by stating that the glorious verse wherein Allah ta`ala Praises the noble character of the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallama) in the Qur’an (al-ahzaab:21) by referring to him as having “uswah hasanah” (beautiful model), is actually proof that his model is NOT complete/perfect (i.e. “kaamil”). He states that for one to think of him possessing a model that is “kaamil” (complete/perfect) is “without doubt an incorrect belief”: "Agar is mawqa` par Qur'an main "uswah kaamilah" ka lafz ist`imal kiya jaa taa to log ghalat fahmi mai pardsaktey thei...AISA SAMAJHNA BILAA SHUBHA AIK GHALAT FAHMI HOTI..."
Why are people following different types of scholars? Islam has been around for thousands of years and the scholars of the past are much more accurate than this woman. If there is doubt, then avoid it. Follow the school of thought you have been following or has been around for ages and avoid this woman. The fact she says that surah yaasin is of no use, she is closer to shirk
having lecturers like dr,Lloyed, Robert and Paul are selves explaing the moto behind it, Their aim is clear to all. Persons like Dr Farhat are spitting a deadly poison in our muslim society. May Allaah SWT protect us from such people.
For God sake wake up!
ReplyDeletethnkx alot 4 give him informtion
DeleteRegarding Authenticity of Dr. Farhat Hashmi (P.hD. from University of Glasgow), please consider the links below, provided by University of Glasgow itself:
ReplyDeleteDr Lloyd Ridgeon
Lecturer in Islamic Studies (at University of Glasgow)
http://www.gla. ac.uk/department s/theology/ staff/lloydridge on/
The full staff mentioned by University of Glasgow for its "Centre for the Study of Islam" can be found at
http://www.gla. ac.uk/department s/theology/ research/ centreforthestud yofislam/ staff/
On the link http://www.gla. ac.uk/department s/theology/ research/ centreforthestud yofislam/ projects/
On the same page, Robert Gleave and Paul Luft are also mentioned other than Lloyd Ridgeon with the context of above mentioned conference
Lloyd Ridgeon, Robert Gleave and Paul Luft are, infact, non-muslims.
Comparing our Ulama-e-karam with a person that is taught (directly or in-directly) by these people, one may decide for "authenticity" himself.
Please try to adjust the sharpness of attachments you post. They can be more useful if we can read it easily.
ReplyDeletejust click on the image. you will get the enlarged version
ReplyDeleteMay ALLAH swt forgive all of us. Only ALLAH swt knows the condition of hearts and intention.
ReplyDeleteIf someone/anyone doing any good work for the din of MUHAMMAD pbuh, I pray Oh AL-Mighty ALLAH bless him with all the rewards.
Please add "him/her" in my last post. I just submitted
ReplyDeleteDoes Dr Farhat Hashmi promoting the belief of Molvi Wahiduddin?
ReplyDeleteWho is Molvi Wahiduddin Khan (India)
To start, Wahiduddin Khan states that the model of the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallama) is no longer applicable in certain partial matters and that we need to instead adopt the model of Christ:
"...Muhammadi model zamani haalat ki nisbat se juzi'i taur par QAABIL-E-INTIBAAQ NA RAHEY GA. IS KE BAJAAI' MASEEH MODEL JUZI'I TAUR PAR QAABIL-E-INTIQAB BAN JAAIY GA."
To make his point all the more clearer, Waheeduddin Khan writes that the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallama) should not be considered to be the “final model” with regards to his minhaaj (pattern/model, i.e. sunnah/qidwah/uswah), but only as the “final prophet” with regards to the deen (religion):
"...LAYKIN MINHAAJ KE I`TIBAAR SE AAP FINAL MODEL NA THEI."
Furthermore, he continues by stating that the glorious verse wherein Allah ta`ala Praises the noble character of the Prophet (Sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallama) in the Qur’an (al-ahzaab:21) by referring to him as having “uswah hasanah” (beautiful model), is actually proof that his model is NOT complete/perfect (i.e. “kaamil”). He states that for one to think of him possessing a model that is “kaamil” (complete/perfect) is “without doubt an incorrect belief”:
"Agar is mawqa` par Qur'an main "uswah kaamilah" ka lafz ist`imal kiya jaa taa to log ghalat fahmi mai pardsaktey thei...AISA SAMAJHNA BILAA SHUBHA AIK GHALAT FAHMI HOTI..."
Why are people following different types of scholars? Islam has been around for thousands of years and the scholars of the past are much more accurate than this woman. If there is doubt, then avoid it. Follow the school of thought you have been following or has been around for ages and avoid this woman. The fact she says that surah yaasin is of no use, she is closer to shirk
ReplyDeleteplz. people wake up don't follow any one only follow rasool allah and quran follow the facts of hadees. do worship of allah rather than any one.
ReplyDeletehaving lecturers like dr,Lloyed, Robert and Paul are selves explaing the moto behind it, Their aim is clear to all. Persons like Dr Farhat are spitting a deadly poison in our muslim society. May Allaah SWT protect us from such people.
ReplyDelete